![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A Plea For PEs |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
dangerlinto
Grand Poobah
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3994 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Topic: A Plea For PEsPosted: 09 Nov 2009 at 10:22am |
|
This thread is for discussion of the article A Plea For PEs
|
|
![]() |
|
dangerlinto
Grand Poobah
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3994 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 10:24am |
|
A very wordy article, I know. If you want to skip to the end, you can, but you'll probably just end up asking questions that were covered in the article, so I urge you to read it all.
|
|
![]() |
|
killernewfie
Senior Member
Aboot time, eh? Joined: 11 Aug 2007 Online Status: Offline Posts: 120 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 11:57am |
|
Hey i think you did a great job, thanks for representing classic so well. It's nice to know we aren't just the ugly stepchild kept in the basement.
|
|
|
MTGO ACCOUNT NAME: rnugent
|
|
![]() |
|
whiffy penguin
Classic Member
Your backyard friend Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Location: philly Online Status: Offline Posts: 914 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 12:04pm |
|
ha ha, nice work danger. i t was all 2nd hand to me after the chat we had but it was good to read it nontheless.
im super duper excited that wotc veiws it as a core format since it makes so much sence in the long run and health of the game.
|
|
|
Member of Clan Magic Eternal. Author of Whiffy's Lunch Box on Pure mtgo.
The thing you know to be true will be the lie that kills you. |
|
![]() |
|
Calavera
Classic Member
Skull plays Blue! Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 12:22pm |
|
I agree that there should only be one room for both premiere and daily events. I think that the solution to the problem of core vs. specialty format is sort of simple.
Create a third category.
I'm going to skip coming up with a good name...
Category 1:
Standard, Block constructed, Current set Sealed
8 man queues for constructed and draft
2 man ques for constructed
16 man swiss sealed queues
4-5 Daily events per day
33+ player 10 tix premiere events
category 2
Classic, Extended, MED sealed, Core sealed, second most recent set sealed (alara)
8 man queues
2 man queues for constructed
1-2 Daily Events per day
24+ man 6 tix premiere event 2-3 times a week
Category 3
100CS, Pauper, core set constructed, Standard singleton, Classic sealed (tempest)
8 man queues
2 man queues for constructed
24 man 6 ticket PE weekly
|
|
![]() |
|
whiffy penguin
Classic Member
Your backyard friend Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Location: philly Online Status: Offline Posts: 914 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 1:44pm |
|
category 2
Classic, Extended, MED sealed, Core sealed, second most recent set sealed (alara)
8 man queues
2 man queues for constructed
1-2 Daily Events per day
24+ man 6 tix premiere event 2-3 times a week
the problem with this is that it dosent make classic a core set. and could in the future hurt its chances.
classic is the last bastion for playability online. eventually more and more exted sets will rotate out into oblivion and if classic isnt there to catch the players and the collections then it could and will hurt the long term growth of the game itself.
as dl said wotc is pretty bright, after all they have been running a pro circut for 15 years and the game itself for close to 20. they know how to keep the game alive and if classic taking a hit right now will ensure its place as a valued format(in wotc's eyes) then in the future we can expect the same kind of love that std and block get now. if we take hits in the long run for a stable meta or firing events right now well then maybe in 2-3 years fow will be a .50 cent card since no one will be playing a format that isnt supported by wotc.
|
|
|
Member of Clan Magic Eternal. Author of Whiffy's Lunch Box on Pure mtgo.
The thing you know to be true will be the lie that kills you. |
|
![]() |
|
grubb
Newbie
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Location: Philadelphia Online Status: Offline Posts: 36 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 1:58pm |
|
Thanks Danger. Tell us what you can, when you can.
I'm envious of your (well-deserved!) trip to Renton, and grateful we had someone like you there. We're a very lucky community. |
|
|
Grubb
|
|
![]() |
|
Calavera
Classic Member
Skull plays Blue! Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 2:03pm |
|
Whiffy, I understand where you are coming from and I think that that is exactly where Wotc is coming from. But I think we all need to be realistic about the desires of the public. Classic and extended just don't have the same size playerbase as Standard and block. We can't fire 10 ticket 33+ man PEs.
Same as in paper magic where you aren't going to get as many people for a Legacy Saturday tourney as you would for Standard.
I think it is great that standard gets the higher cost entry tourneys. But trying to fit Classic and Extended to the same models as Standard just won't work. We are somewhere between the popularity of the fringe formats and standard and we are suffering right now because we are being treated like we have the same playerbase as Standard where we just don't, and never will. But we are no more a fringe format than Legacy is in paper.
The proposal I made above does not in my eyes equate to classic taking a hit. I think we should get the exact same number of PES and Daily Events we get now... (which is already less than Standard and Block get) and just relax the requirements and payout for our PEs to match those of the smaller formats so that they actually fire.
|
|
![]() |
|
whiffy penguin
Classic Member
Your backyard friend Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Location: philly Online Status: Offline Posts: 914 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 3:08pm |
|
i agree with you cal, i do but if i had to pick i would suffer now so that my collection is still worth having in a few years. i dont know about you but i for one do not intend to quit magic untill death or blindness or losing both of my arms force the issue.
as most of the classic community knopws classic is the cheapest format to maintain over a long strecth of time, if i were playing std and ext as my formats of choice the last 2-3 years i would have spent a good deal more money to upkeep and i would have almost nothing to brag about as i would have to sell things b4 each rotation.
i for one am not happy about the state of classic but being an eternal player i want the best for the format and my collection. i trust wotc and even more so since they consider our humble playerbase of just under 300 players (poy total # of players) to be a core format that they want to suceed.
also were so much better then ext. that format is a joke and is only a real format because they cant expect players to get legacy cards for ptq's and protours. the format exists for 3 months and 2 events through out the year. at least classic has been a real format for 2+ years.
|
|
|
Member of Clan Magic Eternal. Author of Whiffy's Lunch Box on Pure mtgo.
The thing you know to be true will be the lie that kills you. |
|
![]() |
|
Calavera
Classic Member
Skull plays Blue! Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 3:36pm |
|
What other option do we have? If the only options are to be treated exactly like standard or exactly like 100CS I of course agree with that being treated like standard is the choice. Certainly being treated like 100Cs and getting 0 daily events would stink and isn't an option.
but putting the PEs on the schedule with the current price and min players is a waste of tournament slot as I think only one has fired. I don't see why they think that they have to treat all core formats exactly the same.
But that isn't even the reality. We didn't get a MOCS last year. We didn't get a Pro Tour or even a GP in paper to increase interest in classic and online playtesting :) We do not get treated the same already, so to say that being a core format means you have to be treated exactly the same as the other core formats is just silly.
|
|
![]() |
|
Calavera
Classic Member
Skull plays Blue! Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 3:40pm |
I think it all boils down to this.... They may need to update their business model. Or do you have any further insight onto exactly what it is and why it needs to be that way that you can share?
|
|
![]() |
|
SICKSICKSICK
Classic Member
But otherwise healthy Joined: 01 Oct 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 312 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 3:58pm |
|
Danger, I don't follow your argument that Rock/Scissors/Paper is going to have a more ardent following than a 10-deck format.
I understand the need to have a community in order to keep an esoteric format from falling off the map (when that happens, the format is probably never coming back to life). Why would R/S/P attract people? People have been complaining about R/S/P since the beginning of time. |
|
![]() |
|
dangerlinto
Grand Poobah
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3994 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 4:23pm |
|
A proper meta game is one that you can follow. For example, if you think you are going to face a lot of Rock, you bring Paper. If you think you are going to face a lot of Paper, you bring Scissors. But that really doesn't happen in classic.
You may think you are going to see a lot of Gro, Thresh one week, and guess right an bring Eva Green and smoke the field. Then perhaps you think people might bring a lot of Eva Green and Gro and Thresh, so you bring something that will have a good game against those (I dunno - some kind of Haterade with Finks) and face off against Affinity and Red Deck Wins. Then the week after that it's Merfolk and Elves and you didn't pack your Engineered Plague, so the next wek you pack for that and find you are facing off against Ad Nauseam and Tezz Control...I could keep going on like this, but this is a very frustrating thing for a player.
I took a quick look at the numbers for just October - and there are 20 differnent deck archetypes in 13 different tournaments. Most of which play very differently from each other.
That's what I'm talking about. People who've complained about Rock/Paper/Scissors are really complaing about a lack of viable deck options. When there are only a triad of good decks in a format, that's bad. But when there are 20 or so viable decks, that's every bit as bad. The Rock/Paper/Scissors I'm talking about isn't about vaible decks, it's about taking deck A and assuming you'll lose to all the decks in category B and beat all the decks in category C. In classic, you are looking at category D, E, F, G etc... and that's just too much for the average competitive player.
But perhaps that's not a direct enough answer. So let me also try it this way:
If people who play classic would stop playing their pet decks and play what wins, we'd have a lot less pet decks to randomly lose to in DEs. And PEs are where Pet decks go to die.
|
|
![]() |
|
Relwarbeht
Senior Member
Joined: 10 Jul 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 124 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Nov 2009 at 5:07pm |
|
"I have to admit that I hadn't really considered that as consequence of
treating classic different in one respect (in this case, PEs) that it
might get treated differently in other respects - to which I can only
relate to you that if you were there, that you would have been under
the impression that saying yes would have been a bad idea. I hope I'm
not relating this in a manner which suggests that WoTC were looking to
for me to justify classic's spot in the core formats - in fact - I
think that if I had have said yes, they probably would have ignored
that suggestion anyway. I almost think it was like a test, to see if I
was ready to cave on Long-term gains over short-term goals. I hope I
didn't do anyone wrong by saying that I agreed that moving classic out
of a Core status solely as a move to regain PEs wasn't something I
thought the community would abide by. I certainly hope you agree."
Danger, Thanks for being an advocate for the classic community. I've got to say it feels like we've got someone with the communities best interest at mind interacting with Wotc. I don't think anyone could ask for more. And I just wanted to emphasize this because I think it would have been very easy for you to answer them differently. Also I agree about the pet deck vs legit deck stuff, it + the dumbest schedule ever is why I've stopped playing classic. |
|
![]() |
|
RenatoAmado
Groupie
Joined: 17 Aug 2007 Location: Brazil Online Status: Offline Posts: 76 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 4:28am |
|
I understand that what Danger wants to stress is that PE's revolves around research and experimentation.
Even a pet deck can be revolved time to time with some modifications and wins in PE's. This situation occurs cause you have a large range of playable decks and you can focus your construction against a prevalent deck that you thinks will appears in great numbers. The mechanic in the DE's are opposed: you will race and you will choice the best or the broken deck. This is not especially bad, but our Community, at least the hard players, look into another way. Our behavior is different of the Standard community, per example, where they use the cards in a different way, always expecting the changes that will occur in a obvious base. We look in a more stable way, expecting small and long term gains, so the PE's are the Events where our attitude gains substance. Every Classic players waits to see what Whiffy or Danger or Hammer will write in their articles, expecting the next big Event to play with their informations, or not? |
|
![]() |
|
menace13
Classic Member
Oh, Mr. Wilson! Joined: 08 May 2009 Location: nyc Online Status: Offline Posts: 861 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 8:09am |
|
yeah i do look forward to whiffy, hammer and DL's articles
not even going to lie, i check the sites often just for those
|
|
![]() |
|
SICKSICKSICK
Classic Member
But otherwise healthy Joined: 01 Oct 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 312 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 9:07am |
|
I want to add that I like DEs a lot. Classic DEs finish in 3-3.5 hours, which is a fairly modest time investment. PEs, on the other hand, are 6-7 hour ordeals if you plan to ever play in the elimination rounds. I work full time, and so PEs on weekdays are a non-starter for me. I would like to see a mix of DEs and 24-man minimum/6 ticket entry PEs, ideally.
|
|
![]() |
|
dangerlinto
Grand Poobah
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3994 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 9:40am |
There was defeintely no badmouthing of DEs. I think they are great for what they provide.
|
|
![]() |
|
Calavera
Classic Member
Skull plays Blue! Joined: 12 Oct 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 757 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 10:20am |
|
I'd be interested in knowing how many people they currently get for the Standard PEs? Is there a way to look that up? I'm wondering if they have to treat us the same could they switch all PEs to the 24 man 6 ticket variety and if they would get a lot more entries for standard that way as well?
And maybe bring back the Weekend Big Event on a rotating basis. The 10 ticket 33 minimim or larger type tourney.
|
|
![]() |
|
walkerdog
Minor Poobah
but don't pet her cat! Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1177 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 4:20pm |
|
So did they give a straight answer as to why they refuse to return 24/6 PEs to all formats? It's so much more popular across the board.
|
|
|
Magic Eternal
|
|
![]() |
|
rukcus
Classic Member
I heard a ruckus! Joined: 20 Nov 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 715 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 5:08pm |
|
the number 1 reason classic is dying is because of the loss of the weekend PEs with 24 min.
this was the one regularity in the sea of randomness that is classic. these tournaments by and large helped shape the metagame. they helped weed out the pet decks from the pro decks. they helped build a sense of community by drawing the varied facets of the classic community into one meeting spot every weekend bringing their best (or most favorite) decks. |
|
![]() |
|
dangerlinto
Grand Poobah
Joined: 25 Sep 2006 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 3994 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2009 at 5:37pm |
|
I agree Rukcus.
I think the chance to get this ship back on track is the weekend right after the 1st Exodus release week. PEs are like your lawnmower - They need a good strong push to get started but keep going after that - until they run out of gas.
|
|
![]() |
|
zaspacer
Groupie
Joined: 26 Sep 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 53 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Nov 2009 at 3:43am |
|
First off, the link on the article points to the wrong forum thread.
http://www.classicquarter.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2437 Classic is obviously an odd duck. Here are some random thoughts... Wasn't Vintage dying out until they introduced Proxy Tournaments? Is there a $$/deck sweet spot to attract players? Why doesn't someone kick off a paper Classic tournament scene. The cards are there, the format guidelines are there. You've spoken of Classic as a Guinea pig, won't any players in the paper community want to try their hand as mad scientists in a raw format? ... they can even have Paper Proxy Classic Tournamets. How about polling players on why they don't play Classic? Is it the $$? Is it the unstable/unclear metagame? Is it the danger in buying $$ cards that might be obsolete tomorrow? Is it the lack of players/matches/tournaments? Are there any FAQs or forums or primers to help players get into Classic? Maybe start a thread that lists: 1) deck types (decklists, how to play, different sideboards/builds vs. other deck types, how to side vs. other deck types, tough/easy matchups, etc.) 2) http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Archive.aspx?tag=Decks%20of%20the%20Week&description=Decks%20of%20the%20Week 3) etc. I know all this has been covered very well, but are the links to this great info stickied somewhere?
I think Magic should add formats to soak up and make use of older cards, favorite decklists, etc.: 1) "best of block/standad" Best of Block: Players can play with any Block deck. (past or present) Best of Standard: Players can play with any Standard deck. (past or present: UG Madness vs. Affinity, Tog vs. Tooth and Nail, etc.) 2) "open block/standard" Open Block: Players can make a block deck with any 3 sets. Open Standard: Players can make a standard deck with any 7 sets. Lots of people have the cards from their old block/standard decks. And lots of people LOVED playing these decks. So let them dig them back up and play them again. |
|
![]() |
|
walkerdog
Minor Poobah
but don't pet her cat! Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1177 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Nov 2009 at 5:04am |
|
I think bringing back Pris with heavy support would be a good idea. |
|
|
Magic Eternal
|
|
![]() |
|
BatDwarf
Senior Member
Joined: 06 Jul 2009 Online Status: Offline Posts: 129 |
Post Options
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Nov 2009 at 5:13am |
|
Well, I for one think that they could increase the popularity of classic by just giving all players a 4x collection.
That'd do it for sure. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |