Naming editor needed

 

Danger uploads the placing decks onto his server.  You log in to a specially designated portion of the site and replace the words "Bazaar of Baghdad's deck" to "Zoo" or whathaveyou (after seeing the list based on the provided link).  That's the minimum, and as you can see, a lot fo decks are being added each week these days.

 

I try to ensure correct spelling since a good database depends on that, and uniformity of style.  I've been using the convention of "Archetype - Subtype".  This gets in more search terms, and Danger and I have worked out a system where his POY archetype stats groups everything before the hyphen.  So for two Pox decks "Pox - BG Bloodghast" and "Pox - MonoBlack Rack" work better than "BG Pox" and "Rackapox"; the first method groups the decks together, the second one leaves them completely independent statwise.  I try to be descriptive as possible.  Like "UG* Control - CounterTop Landstill" getting in as many engines as possible.  The * in the last example is useful as it allows you to group decks together, as otherwise you might have UGw, UGb, UGr, UGWb, UGwb, etc.  If a name is popular but not descriptive, I'll usually keep it.  I kept 'Baseruption' since that is the name of the legacy deck that would otherwise be hard to name, but for Team America, I went with "UBG Control - TeamAmerica" so it could be grouped with a few other UBG Control decks we have on file but still have TeamAmerica as a search term.  I went with Merfolk for a long time, but recently have added things like "Merfolk - Black Splash" "Merfolk - Goyf Splash" and "Merfolk - Black, Goyf Splash" since they are relatively prominent now.  I haven't done much Oath categorizing yet, since a default decklist has not yet coalesced. 

 

You also have the power to change the type of deck from "Aggro" to "Combo" etc. but Danger does that himself, and I rarely change that anymore; still in the interest of consistency make sure you don't change some of one archetype, but leave, say, the January ones unchanged.

 

Anyways, the main point is that someone who is timely, very systematic, willing to do a bit of research (for example, deckcheck.net), and careful with details will do a good job.